S3 Series :: View topic

Let me see <Dick mode full on>....

RC
"This P-51 Flight model sucks! I have to trim it or it wants to turn left!"
"This P-51 Flight model is porked...I lose altitude when I turn at 30k"
Gets shot down in S3...
"This P-51 Flight model is just not right....those FM guys have no clue."

WildBill:
"You have data which says otherwise?"

RC
"Yes I have a book which says it was the hottest fighter of its time. I'll send you the data."

<Dick mode still on>
Dobs
Scans Flight model forum for posts by RC showing contradictory data for P-51...doesn't find any.

Comes here and makes post....refrains from calling RC a dumbass because I'm told thats not polite.

=dobs= wrote:

response (full Defense on)
1. I do know how to fly and wildbill asked me to send data on 2 separate aircraft and I did.
2. a huge reason this community and game sucks is because act like you know what your doing when reality you do not. and lets also thrown is the fact that negativity has cause a lot of people to quit.
3. I am not a programmer but I applaud you dobs, and dawger for having the skills.
4. there are lots of people like yourselves who don't listen to anyone's opinion and don't say you do, cause you really don't. how I know that because I heard from different people tell me, i'm going to say who though.
lastly you guys won't have to deal with me after this series is over.

rcflys wrote:

=dobs= wrote:

Your opinion is obviously listened to, as is easily evidenced by the responses to this thread.

Your opinion is not acted upon because it is wildly wrong.

if your asking if i would share the data that i have to compare it to roberts, then yes. but seeing how i not going to be around after this series then all of it defeats the point then.

rcflys wrote:

if your asking if i would share the data that i have to compare it to roberts, then yes. but seeing how i not going to be around after this series then all of it defeats the point then.

So you claim to have found an issue with the FM...but instead of bringing the buggy info to light you are quitting instead?

Author:	rcflys [ Wed Jun 08, 2016 12:16 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: P51 FM
understood dobs. and jugggo i sent data to wildbill because he asked for it. so technically you are being a dick.

Author:	Jugggo [ Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:03 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: P51 FM
Technically yes I am, and why would he ask for it? Scenario#1 Oh because he was sitting there having Sunday breakfast and said to himself, I have to get a hold of RC for that data from his neat fancy book because it has ALL the answers in it. Scenario #2 you bitched in his ear about it (because like said before you don't know how to fly it or know the data it has from testing) and his response as a business owner is A typical send me the info. I'll go with #2.

Author:	=dobs= [ Wed Jun 08, 2016 2:12 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: P51 FM
Let me see <Dick mode full on>.... RC "This P-51 Flight model sucks! I have to trim it or it wants to turn left!" "This P-51 Flight model is porked...I lose altitude when I turn at 30k" Gets shot down in S3... "This P-51 Flight model is just not right....those FM guys have no clue." WildBill: "You have data which says otherwise?" RC "Yes I have a book which says it was the hottest fighter of its time. I'll send you the data." <Dick mode still on> Dobs Scans Flight model forum for posts by RC showing contradictory data for P-51...doesn't find any. Comes here and makes post....refrains from calling RC a dumbass because I'm told thats not polite.

Author:	rcflys [ Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:47 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: P51 FM
=dobs= wrote: Let me see <Dick mode full on>.... RC "This P-51 Flight model sucks! I have to trim it or it wants to turn left!" "This P-51 Flight model is porked...I lose altitude when I turn at 30k" Gets shot down in S3... "This P-51 Flight model is just not right....those FM guys have no clue." WildBill: "You have data which says otherwise?" RC "Yes I have a book which says it was the hottest fighter of its time. I'll send you the data." <Dick mode still on> Dobs Scans Flight model forum for posts by RC showing contradictory data for P-51...doesn't find any. Comes here and makes post....refrains from calling RC a dumbass because I'm told thats not polite. response (full Defense on) 1. I do know how to fly and wildbill asked me to send data on 2 separate aircraft and I did. 2. a huge reason this community and game sucks is because act like you know what your doing when reality you do not. and lets also thrown is the fact that negativity has cause a lot of people to quit. 3. I am not a programmer but I applaud you dobs, and dawger for having the skills. 4. there are lots of people like yourselves who don't listen to anyone's opinion and don't say you do, cause you really don't. how I know that because I heard from different people tell me, i'm going to say who though. lastly you guys won't have to deal with me after this series is over.

Author:	dawger [ Wed Jun 08, 2016 5:02 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: P51 FM
rcflys wrote: =dobs= wrote: Let me see <Dick mode full on>.... RC "This P-51 Flight model sucks! I have to trim it or it wants to turn left!" "This P-51 Flight model is porked...I lose altitude when I turn at 30k" Gets shot down in S3... "This P-51 Flight model is just not right....those FM guys have no clue." WildBill: "You have data which says otherwise?" RC "Yes I have a book which says it was the hottest fighter of its time. I'll send you the data." <Dick mode still on> Dobs Scans Flight model forum for posts by RC showing contradictory data for P-51...doesn't find any. Comes here and makes post....refrains from calling RC a dumbass because I'm told thats not polite. response (full Defense on) 1. I do know how to fly and wildbill asked me to send data on 2 separate aircraft and I did. 2. a huge reason this community and game sucks is because act like you know what your doing when reality you do not. and lets also thrown is the fact that negativity has cause a lot of people to quit. 3. I am not a programmer but I applaud you dobs, and dawger for having the skills. 4. there are lots of people like yourselves who don't listen to anyone's opinion and don't say you do, cause you really don't. how I know that because I heard from different people tell me, i'm going to say who though. lastly you guys won't have to deal with me after this series is over. Your opinion is obviously listened to, as is easily evidenced by the responses to this thread. Your opinion is not acted upon because it is wildly wrong.

S3 Series http://www.squadselectseries.com/s3forum/

P51 FM http://www.squadselectseries.com/s3forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2048	Page 2 of 3

Author:	rcflys [ Wed Jun 08, 2016 5:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: P51 FM
dawger wrote: rcflys wrote: =dobs= wrote: Let me see <Dick mode full on>.... RC "This P-51 Flight model sucks! I have to trim it or it wants to turn left!" "This P-51 Flight model is porked...I lose altitude when I turn at 30k" Gets shot down in S3... "This P-51 Flight model is just not right....those FM guys have no clue." WildBill: "You have data which says otherwise?" RC "Yes I have a book which says it was the hottest fighter of its time. I'll send you the data." <Dick mode still on> Dobs Scans Flight model forum for posts by RC showing contradictory data for P-51...doesn't find any. Comes here and makes post....refrains from calling RC a dumbass because I'm told thats not polite. response (full Defense on) 1. I do know how to fly and wildbill asked me to send data on 2 separate aircraft and I did. 2. a huge reason this community and game sucks is because act like you know what your doing when reality you do not. and lets also thrown is the fact that negativity has cause a lot of people to quit. 3. I am not a programmer but I applaud you dobs, and dawger for having the skills. 4. there are lots of people like yourselves who don't listen to anyone's opinion and don't say you do, cause you really don't. how I know that because I heard from different people tell me, i'm going to say who though. lastly you guys won't have to deal with me after this series is over. Your opinion is obviously listened to, as is easily evidenced by the responses to this thread. Your opinion is not acted upon because it is wildly wrong. understood. and dobs even if you did call me a dumbass I could careless because I've been called every name in the book before. Dawger in your view and jugggo as well, your view is that I'm wrong but I don't see it that way. but that's just me.

Author:	Jman [ Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:02 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: P51 FM
Would you happen to share the data you have that directly contradicts Roberts test data?

Author:	rcflys [ Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:11 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: P51 FM
if your asking if i would share the data that i have to compare it to roberts, then yes. but seeing how i not going to be around after this series then all of it defeats the point then.

Author:	Jman [ Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: P51 FM
rcflys wrote: if your asking if i would share the data that i have to compare it to roberts, then yes. but seeing how i not going to be around after this series then all of it defeats the point then. So you claim to have found an issue with the FM...but instead of bringing the buggy info to light you are quitting instead?

Author:	dawger [ Thu Jun 09, 2016 6:33 am ]
Post subject:	Re: P51 FM
Jman wrote: rcflys wrote: if your asking if i would share the data that i have to compare it to roberts, then yes. but seeing how i not going to be around after this series then all of it defeats the point then. So you claim to have found an issue with the FM...but instead of bringing the buggy info to light you are quitting instead? He isnt going to volunteer the actual proof that he is talking out his ass ( if it actually existed)If he had sent it to Wild Bill, I am sure Bill would have already given this prized information to the FM team. It doesnt actually exist.

Page 2 of 3	All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/